[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091201160151.GD2262@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:01:51 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: divide by zero in termios when setting bluetooth
Hi!
> > I triggered this by mistake... "W" taint is from the WARN_ON()
> > before.
>
> This ought to fix it
>
> serial: Fix crash if the minimum rate of the device is > 9600 baud
>
> From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
>
> In that situation if the old rate is invalid and the new rate is invalid
> and the chip cannot do 9600 baud we report zero, which makes all the
> drivers explode.
>
> Instead force the rate based on min/max
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> }
>
> /*
> - * As a last resort, if the quotient is zero,
> - * default to 9600 bps
> + * As a last resort, if the range cannot be met then clip to
> + * the nearest chip supported rate.
> */
> - if (!hung_up)
> - tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios, 9600, 9600);
> + if (!hung_up) {
> + if (baud <= min)
> + tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios,
> + min + 1, min + 1);
> + else
> + tty_termios_encode_baud_rate(termios,
> + max - 1, max - 1);
> + }
> }
> -
> + /* Should never happen */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> return 0;
Does this mean WARN_ON() on user error? Maybe printk(KERN_ERR) with
explanation would be better?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists