linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] tty: move a definition out of switch block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091201154412.4002a0d8@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 15:44:12 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>,
	Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] tty: move a definition out of switch block

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 02:54:44 -0500
Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:

> 
> It's not good to leave a definition between 'switch'
> and its first label. Move it out of the switch block.

"Not good". On what basis is it not good to put variables local to
their scope ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/