linux-kernel - Re: OOM kernel behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0912011241400.10926@router.home>
Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 12:42:10 -0600 (CST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jonathan Miles <jon@...us.co.uk>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OOM kernel behaviour

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009, Jonathan Miles wrote:

> Okay, so my kernel shouldn't be behaving like this?

No it should properly do reclaim.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/