[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091201195747.GA4861@one.lan>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:57:48 +0100
From: Wouter van Heyst <larstiq@...stiq.dyndns.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
504391@...s.debian.org, Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are
assumed removable
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:32:16PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:42 +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:
...
> > I'm running 2.6.32-rc7 with this patch applied and CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y
> > That works as desired for my non-removable case. Is it desired that I
> > test if 'removable=1' will thrash my filesystem?
>
> Please test with CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=n (which Debian will continue
> to use) and removable=0.
It took a while to get around to it correctly, but yes this works.
Without setting removable=0 my Acer Aspire One hangs while trying to
resume if the mmc card is mounted.
Wouter van Heyst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists