lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912011340.21370.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:40:19 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the pci tree

On Monday 30 November 2009 03:26:05 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 November 2009 07:22:28 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Today's linux-next merge of the acpi tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/pci/hotplug/acpiphp_glue.c between commit
> > 204d49a5613a06eb2fa5c3b842a29b1336cc7995 ("PCI hotplug: move IOAPIC
> > support from acpiphp to ioapic driver") from the pci tree and commit
> > 2263576cfc6e8f6ab038126c3254404b9fcb1c33 ("ACPICA: Add post-order
> > callback to acpi_walk_namespace") from the acpi tree.
> > 
> > The former moved part of the code modified by the latter into another
> > file.  All the calls to acpi_walk_namespace() seem to have been removed
> > in this process.
> 
> I was on vacation last week, so couldn't respond earlier, sorry.
> 
> As you noticed, 204d49a56 removed some acpi_walk_namespace() calls.
> It removed calls to the old "pre-order only" version, while 263576cfc
> converted acpi_walk_namespace() to a new "pre-order and post-order"
> version.
> 
> This is conceptually simple because 204d49a56 is just removing uses
> of acpi_walk_namespace(), so we don't care at all whether it removes
> calls to the old or new version.  But I don't have enough git-fu to
> know how to fix this.

Has this been resolved already?  Is there anything I can do to help?

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ