linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3]fs/inode: iunique() Optimize Performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b3657a100911302101t59a07518tddfd0a267d4ce64c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Dec 2009 13:01:57 +0800
From:	liu weni <qingshenlwy@...il.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	strongzgy <strongzgy@...il.com>, xgr178 <xgr178@....com>,
	Liu Hui <onlyflyer@...il.com>, viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, jack <jack@...e.cz>,
	npiggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]fs/inode: iunique() Optimize Performance

Thanks, I will try others way to improve the performance.


2009/11/26 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 08:20:02PM +0100, J?r?my Cochoy wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> There is something strange in iunique : what will happend if all inode
>> between max_reserved+1 and (unsinged in)(0-1) ? Will it make an
>> infinite loop or an interruption can happen and make an inode become
>> free?
>
> Another process can free an inode while this loop is executing.
>
>> In that case, it will be better to stop search when counter overflow, no?
>
> If you have all four billion inodes allocated, you have significantly
> bigger problems than this loop.  For a start, at 600 bytes per inode,
> I'd like to see your machine with 2.4TB of memory.  Then there's the
> size of your inode hash, and the depth of the chains within it.
>
>> Will it not be better to use a field max_ino_used (in superblock, for
>> exemple) where we store the last inode allocated with iunique and make
>> a search only if max_ino_used become to (unsigned)(-1) ?
>>
>> But, if iunique is here to provide a solution in order to generate
>> unused inode in filesystem which have various inode number, it's
>> better to use a list of used ino, in a short hash table which use the
>> first 8 bits of the inode, always use the same function to create a
>> new inode and look at the head if we can add a new inode with bigger
>> ino and still in the range. (But i think filesystems developper prefer
>> to write ther own functions in order to do that, no?)
>>
>> Well, if we want to stop in case of full inode filesystem, we can put
>> the first condition in the head and add change return as :
>> return inode->i_ino > max_reserved ? res : 0; // 0 might "i can't find
>> an inode after max_reserved"
>
> Gloves.
>
> http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/The_Complicator_0x27_s_Gloves.aspx
>
> --
> Matthew Wilcox                          Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
> operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
> a retrograde step."
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/