[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259751679.4003.466.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:01:19 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
avi@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] sched: refactor try_to_wake_up()
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 19:14 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On 12/02/2009 07:10 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >>> I think it would _look_ better with the thing just
> >>> duplicated/stripped down and called what it is,
> >>> sched_notifier_wakeup() or such.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I'm not following. Can you elaborate a bit?
> >
> > I mean copying ttwu, stripping out locking etc, and renaming the result
> > would look better. No functional difference though, and binary growth
> > would be left in the wake of such a duplication.
>
> Ah... okay. Well, that was the first approach (with some missing
> parts). Peter wasn't particularly happy with code duplication and
> suggested refactoring ttwu and reuse common parts.
Right, esp since it missed some parts.
I haven't yet had time to look at this patch, but yeah, sharing code
seems like a good idea since its tricky and fragile code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists