[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iqcpk3wp.fsf@trdhcp146196.ntc.nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:32:06 +0200
From: jouni.hogander@...ia.com (Högander Jouni)
To: ext Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: "Valentin Eduardo \(Nokia-D\/Helsinki\)" <eduardo.valentin@...ia.com>,
"De-Schrijver Peter \(Nokia-D\/Helsinki\)"
<Peter.De-Schrijver@...ia.com>,
"Keski-Saari Juha.1 \(EXT-Teleca\/Helsinki\)"
<ext-juha.1.keski-saari@...ia.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lrg\@slimlogic.co.uk" <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Doubt about Regulator Framework and VBAT use case
ext Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>
>> I'm writing to ask about VBAT use case. What is the expected
>> way to use regulator framework in case of rail coming from battery?
>> Should it be added to the regulator framework at all?
>
> ...
>
>> However, drivers for devices on that rail would require their regulator anyway.
>> And I guess the point would be that drivers should not be aware that they are on VBAT
>> or any other rail.
>
> I'd add it as a fixed voltage regulator and either not specify the
> voltage or specify the nominal voltage.
I was preparing patch for this when I noticed that fixed voltage
regulator can control only one regulator. Are you aware of any ongoing
work to enable control for multiple regulators in
fixed-voltage-regulator?
--
Jouni Högander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists