[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B168107.8020708@analog.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:00:23 +0800
From: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@...log.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, uclinux-dev@...inux.org,
David McCullough <davidm@...pgear.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: use copy_*_user_page() in access_process_vm()
On 12/02/2009 10:36 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Mike Frysinger<vapier@...too.org> wrote:
>
>> - len -= copy_to_user((void *) addr, buf, len);
>> + copy_to_user_page(vma, NULL, NULL,
>> + (void *) addr, buf, len);
>> else if (!write&& vma->vm_flags& VM_MAYREAD)
>> - len -= copy_from_user(buf, (void *) addr, len);
>> + copy_from_user_page(vma, NULL, NULL,
>> + buf, (void *) addr, len);
>
> Hmmm... With this, len isn't updated anymore, and so it alters the return
> value of access_process_vm(), and means ptrace_readdata() won't now return
> -EIO under some circumstances where it used to. I'm not sure that matters,
> though.
>
This keeps access_process_vm() in nommu.c align with the one in
memory.c. If this does really matter, someone or me can write another
patch to take care of it for both MMU and !MMU later.
Jie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists