linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] high system time & lock contention running large mixed workload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:00:07 -0500
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
CC:	Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] high system time & lock contention running large mixed
 workload

On 12/01/2009 05:04 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 05:00:29PM -0500, Larry Woodman wrote:
>    
>> Before the splitLRU patch shrink_active_list() would only call
>> page_referenced() when reclaim_mapped got set.  reclaim_mapped only got
>> set when the priority worked its way from 12 all the way to 7. This
>> prevented page_referenced() from being called from shrink_active_list()
>> until the system was really struggling to reclaim memory.
>>      
> page_referenced should never be called and nobody should touch ptes
> until priority went down to 7. This is a regression in splitLRU that
> should be fixed. With light VM pressure we should never touch ptes ever.
>    
You appear to have not read the code, either.

The VM should not look at the active anon list much,
unless it has a good reason to start evicting anonymous
pages.  Yes, there was a bug in shrink_list(), but Kosaki
and I just posted patches to fix that.

As for page_referenced not being called until priority
goes down to 7 - that is one of the root causes the old
VM did not scale.  The number of pages that need to
be scanned to get down to that point is staggeringly
huge on systems with 1TB of RAM - a much larger
number than we should EVER scan in the pageout code.

There is no way we could go back to that heuristic.
It fell apart before and it would continue to fall apart
if we reintroduced it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/