lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091202154223.GA5895@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 07:42:23 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>,
	stable@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: flush wl before clearing update marker

On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 08:48:43AM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
> 
> ubiupdatevol -t does the following:
> - ubi_start_update()
>   - set_update_marker()
>   - for all LEBs ubi_eba_unmap_leb()
>   - clear_update_marker()
>   - ubi_wl_flush()
> 
> ubi_wl_flush() physically erases all PEB, once it returns all PEBs are
> empty. clear_update_marker() has the update marker written after return.
> If there is a power cut between the last two functions then the UBI
> volume has no longer the "update" marker set and may have some valid
> LEBs while some of them may be gone.
> If that volume in question happens to be a UBIFS volume, then mount
> will fail with
> 
> |UBIFS error (pid 1361): ubifs_read_node: bad node type (255 but expected 6)
> |UBIFS error (pid 1361): ubifs_read_node: bad node at LEB 0:0
> |Not a node, first 24 bytes:
> |00000000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> 
> if there is at least one valid LEB and the wear-leveling worker managed
> to clear LEB 0.
> 
> The patch waits for the wl worker to finish prior clearing the "update"
> marker on flash. The two new LEB which are scheduled for erasing after
> clear_update_marker() should not matter because they are only visible to
> UBI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@...ia.com>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/ubi/upd.c |   20 +++++++++++---------


I'm not the mtd or ubi maintainer, so why did you send this to me?

confused,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ