linux-kernel - Re: some recent scheduler patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1259780642.4003.1493.camel@laptop>
Date:	Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:04:02 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: some recent scheduler patches

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 19:53 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> 
> 83f54960c11a14942ab00b54c51e91906b9d8235: sched: for_each_domain() vs RCU
> I don't see what is the step that causes FAIL? sched-domains code is
> using synchronize_sched(), so that part should be safe.

Yeah, I got myself properly confused there. I was meaning to remove that
rcu_read_lock() there again.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/