[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1259783983-26884-3-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 14:59:43 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: jamie@...reable.org, pavel@....cz, miklos@...redi.hu,
viro@...IV.linux.org.uk, duaneg@...da.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: force reval on dentry of bind mounted files on FS_REVAL_DOT filesystems
In the case of a bind mounted file, the path walking code will assume
that the cached dentry that was bind mounted is valid. This is a problem
problem for NFSv4 in a way that's similar to LAST_BIND symlinks.
Fix this by revalidating the dentry if FS_FOLLOW_DOT is set and
__follow_mount returns true.
Note that in the non-open codepath, we cannot return an error to the
lookup if the revalidation fails. Doing so will leave a bind mount in
a state such that we can't unmount it. In that case we'll just have to
settle for d_invalidating it (which should mostly turn out to be a
d_drop in this case) and returning success.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
---
fs/namei.c | 11 ++++++++++-
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 339789e..0d55b6f 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -851,7 +851,13 @@ static int do_lookup(struct nameidata *nd, struct qstr *name,
done:
path->mnt = mnt;
path->dentry = dentry;
- __follow_mount(path);
+
+ /*
+ * cannot return the error returned by force_reval_path as that can
+ * make it impossible to unmount a bind mounted dentry if it's stale.
+ */
+ if (__follow_mount(path))
+ force_reval_path(path, nd);
return 0;
need_lookup:
@@ -1840,6 +1846,9 @@ do_last:
error = -ELOOP;
if (flag & O_NOFOLLOW)
goto exit_dput;
+ error = force_reval_path(&path, &nd);
+ if (error)
+ goto exit_dput;
}
error = -ENOENT;
--
1.5.5.6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists