linux-kernel - [PATCH] hugetlb: Acquire the i_mmap_lock before walking the prio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091202222049.GC26702@csn.ul.ie>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:20:49 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] hugetlb: Acquire the i_mmap_lock before walking the
	prio_tree to unmap a page V2

Changelog since V1
o Delete stupid comment from the description

When the owner of a mapping fails  COW because a child process is holding
a reference, the children VMAs are walked and the page is unmapped. The
i_mmap_lock is taken for the unmapping of the page but not the walking of
the prio_tree. In theory, that tree could be changing if the lock is not
held. This patch takes the i_mmap_lock properly for the duration of the
prio_tree walk.

[hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk: Spotted the problem in the first place]
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
---
 mm/hugetlb.c |    9 ++++++++-
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index a952cb8..5adc284 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -1906,6 +1906,12 @@ static int unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		+ (vma->vm_pgoff >> PAGE_SHIFT);
 	mapping = (struct address_space *)page_private(page);
 
+	/*
+	 * Take the mapping lock for the duration of the table walk. As
+	 * this mapping should be shared between all the VMAs,
+	 * __unmap_hugepage_range() is called as the lock is already held
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
 	vma_prio_tree_foreach(iter_vma, &iter, &mapping->i_mmap, pgoff, pgoff) {
 		/* Do not unmap the current VMA */
 		if (iter_vma == vma)
@@ -1919,10 +1925,11 @@ static int unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * from the time of fork. This would look like data corruption
 		 */
 		if (!is_vma_resv_set(iter_vma, HPAGE_RESV_OWNER))
-			unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma,
+			__unmap_hugepage_range(iter_vma,
 				address, address + huge_page_size(h),
 				page);
 	}
+	spin_unlock(&mapping->i_mmap_lock);
 
 	return 1;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/