linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: automatically free the in-memory image once s2disk has finished with it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091202222516.GD26702@csn.ul.ie>
Date:	Wed, 2 Dec 2009 22:25:16 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: automatically free the in-memory image once
	s2disk has finished with it

On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 11:15:24PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2009-12-02 22:07:18, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:11:07PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Wed 2009-12-02 14:28:12, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> > > > The original in-kernel suspend (swsusp) frees the in-memory hibernation
> > > > image before powering off the machine.  s2disk doesn't, so there is
> > > > _much_ less free memory when it tries to power off.
> > > > 
> > > > This is a gratuitous difference.  The userspace suspend interface
> > > > /dev/snapshot only allows the hibernation image to be read once.
> > > > Once the s2disk program has read the last page, we can free the entire
> > > > image.
> > > > 
> > > > This avoids a hang after writing the hibernation image which was
> > > > triggered by commit 5f8dcc21211a3d4e3a7a5ca366b469fb88117f61
> > > > "page-allocator: split per-cpu list into one-list-per-migrate-type":
> > > 
> > > Yes, you work around page-allocator hang. But is it right thing to do?
> > > 
> > 
> > What's wrong with it? The hang is likely because the allocator has no
> > memory to work with. The patch in question makes small changes to the
> > amount of available memory but it shouldn't matter on uni-core. Some
> > structures are slightly larger but it's extremely borderline. I'm at a
> > loss to explain actually why it makes a difference untill things were
> > extremely borderline to begin with.
> 
> We reserve 4MB, for such purposes, and we already wrote image to disk
> with such constrains, so memory should not be _too_ tight.
> 
> Can you try increasing PAGES_FOR_IO to 8MB or something like that?
> 

What's wrong with just freeing the memory that is no longer required?

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/