| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4B16F389.4090801@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:08:57 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@...cle.com, wcohen@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, jbaron@...hat.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Subject: Re: trace/events: DECLARE vs DEFINE semantic On 12/02/2009 02:57 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: >> >> TRACE_CLASS - Declares a class >> TRACE_CLASS_EVENT - defines an event for said class >> TRACE_EVENT - Declares a class and defines an event (as is today) > > Yep, it looks good! It's self-descriptive and don't require to explain > what the thing is doing each time we refer to it. (however I feel a bit > sad for Fred, Wilma and Barney) ;) > Although you have to admit it's a bit confusing that: TRACE_EVENT = TRACE_CLASS + TRACE_CLASS_EVENT ... as opposed to ... TRACE_CLASS_EVENT = TRACE_CLASS + TRACE_EVENT -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists