[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B17A2F8.9080408@petalogix.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:37:28 +0100
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...alogix.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 3
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 12/03/2009 04:40 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> todays tree is working on MMU microblaze correctly without any visible
>> problem but noMMU microblaze kernel still have that bug as I reported
>> some days ago.
>
> Other than triggering WARN_ON(), it doesn't cause any other problems,
> right? It's probably because SMP_CACHE_BYTES on that configuration is
> lower than 8. What is the value of SMP_CACHE_BYTES on the
> configuration? Also, doesn't the Linus's tree have the same problem?
aaa - I was too fast and compiled noMMU tree for 09-12-02 not todays.
You can check it at http://www.monstr.eu/wiki/doku.php?id=log:log
The problem seems to me is away.
Thanks,
Michal
>
> The somewhat spurious WARN_ON() in percpu allocator should probably be
> just removed or bumped to check against PAGE_SIZE as SMP code does.
> The problem is that on UP even though the function takes @align
> parameter, it just ignores it. :-(
>
> Thanks.
>
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
PetaLogix - Linux Solutions for a Reconfigurable World
w: www.petalogix.com p: +61-7-30090663,+42-0-721842854 f: +61-7-30090663
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists