[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8FED46E8A9CA574792FC7AACAC38FE7714FF5709D9@PDSMSX501.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 23:03:15 +0800
From: "Ma, Ling" <ling.ma@...el.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] [X86] Compile Option Os versus O2 on latest x86
platform
> a key question is.. how much more memory do you have free due to -Os?
> (because memory is cache is performance on a system level as well)
The kernel code size from Os is 12M, that from O2 is 14M.
> and how much less icache pressure is there?
>From perf stat report, cache reference(unified cache) from O2 is almost the same with Os.
Thanks
Ling
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists