[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd3b2d10912030718q30176616r1ac3b71a4399fc0b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:18:11 -0700
From: Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch] tty: move a definition out of switch block
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 01:36, Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:
> Generally putting variables local in the local scope is fine, but
> not for 'switch' block, to be more precisely, not for the case
> where putting local variables between 'switch' and its _first_
> label, IMO.
It is fine to declare variables at the start of a switch statement.
What *is* incorrect is either initializing such declared variables
(they won't get initialized) or declaring variables *after* a case
label (throws a compile error).
> It can lead to misunderstanding easily, since 'switch'
> jumps to its first label at a first glance. I know in this case
> the code is _not_ wrong, but again, it's not good for reading.
I would think the declaration inside the start of the switch block
would just indicate to the reader that the variable is local to the
switch block scope.
> Also, there's no conflicts if we put it out of 'switch' block.
But then the scope of these variables becomes larger than it need be.
-Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists