linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:39:48 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes

On 12/03/2009 11:59 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> The merge window is upon us, which by strict rules means that anything
>> not already in libata-dev.git#upstream needs to wait until 2.6.34.
>
> Not quite yet - Linus hasn't said "go"

He rarely if ever says "go."  The kernel X is released, and people send 
pull requests to Linus for X+1.  He typically merges immediately, but 
does not push out the first set of merges for a few days.

The stuff pushed to Linus for kernel X+1 should have already been living 
in linux-next (libata-dev.git#NEXT, to us).


> The bits that probably should be delayed a bit more (if any) IMHO are the
> 32bit enables for hardware that doesn't use 32bit by default on the
> drivers/ide stack, and tweaks for obscure old hardware that won't get
> much testing.

Agreed mostly...  I still want to push fixes even if for obscure hardware.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/