linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2] Another approach to IR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B17FD03.6070207@thalesgroup.com>
Date:	Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:01:39 +0100
From:	Emmanuel Fusté <emmanuel.fuste@...lesgroup.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Another approach to IR

>
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 02:33:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Ferenc Wagner wrote:
> > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com> writes:
> > 
> > We should not forget that simple IR's don't have any key to select the address,
> > so the produced codes there will never have KEY_TV/KEY_DVD, etc.
>
> Wait, wait, KEY_TV, KEY_DVD, KEY_TAPE - they should be used to select
> media inputs in a device/application. My receiver accepts codees like
> that.
>   
Yes, it seem that there is confusion here.
Forget my proposition. It is a corner case that could be handled later 
if needed.


Cheers,
Emmanuel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/