| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200912032256.39790.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 22:56:39 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes
On Thursday 03 December 2009 10:51:09 pm Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>> pata_via: clear UDMA transfer mode bit for PIO and MWDMA
> >>
> >> applied -- even though Alan's comment was correct. It is standard
> >> kernel practice to place cosmetic changes into their own patches,
> >> because it is standard kernel practice to break up logically distinct
> >> changes.
> >
> > We are talking about:
> >
> > pata_via.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > patch here (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/25/380) and cosmetic change
> > is clearly documented in the patch description.
> >
> >
> > Do people really wonder why I find upstream to be too much hassle to
> > deal with?
>
> The thousand other kernel developers seem to be able to split up their
> patches, separating out cosmetic changes from functional ones. It has
> clear engineering benefits, and has been standard practice for a decade
> or more.
>
> Why is it such an imposition for your patches to look like everyone
> else's? And by "everyone", I mean all other kernel developers, not just
> other ATA developers.
>
> You seem to consider standard kernel practice a hassle. Separating out
> cosmetic changes is not only a libata practice, it is the norm for the
> entire kernel.
Indeed.
>From 94be9a58d7e683ac3c1df1858a17f09ebade8da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:17:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [libata] get-identity ioctl: Fix use of invalid memory pointer
for SAS drivers.
Caught by Ke Wei (and team?) at Marvell.
Also, move the ata_scsi_ioctl export to libata-scsi.c, as that seems to be the
general trend.
Acked-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 1 -
drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
drivers/scsi/ipr.c | 2 +-
drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c | 2 +-
include/linux/libata.h | 2 ++
5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 71218d7..552ecae 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -6638,7 +6638,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_dev_pair);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_port_disable);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_ratelimit);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_wait_register);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_scsi_ioctl);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_scsi_queuecmd);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_scsi_slave_config);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_scsi_slave_destroy);
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index 9e92107..a1a6e62 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -423,9 +423,9 @@ int ata_std_bios_param(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct block_device *bdev,
* RETURNS:
* Zero on success, negative errno on error.
*/
-static int ata_get_identity(struct scsi_device *sdev, void __user *arg)
+static int ata_get_identity(struct ata_port *ap, struct scsi_device *sdev,
+ void __user *arg)
{
- struct ata_port *ap = ata_shost_to_port(sdev->host);
struct ata_device *dev = ata_scsi_find_dev(ap, sdev);
u16 __user *dst = arg;
char buf[40];
@@ -645,7 +645,8 @@ int ata_task_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, void __user *arg)
return rc;
}
-int ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
+int ata_sas_scsi_ioctl(struct ata_port *ap, struct scsi_device *scsidev,
+ int cmd, void __user *arg)
{
int val = -EINVAL, rc = -EINVAL;
@@ -663,7 +664,7 @@ int ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
return 0;
case HDIO_GET_IDENTITY:
- return ata_get_identity(scsidev, arg);
+ return ata_get_identity(ap, scsidev, arg);
case HDIO_DRIVE_CMD:
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
@@ -682,6 +683,14 @@ int ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
return rc;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_scsi_ioctl);
+
+int ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *scsidev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
+{
+ return ata_sas_scsi_ioctl(ata_shost_to_port(scsidev->host),
+ scsidev, cmd, arg);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_scsi_ioctl);
/**
* ata_scsi_qc_new - acquire new ata_queued_cmd reference
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
index 841f460..0782900 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ipr.c
@@ -4912,7 +4912,7 @@ static int ipr_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
if (res && ipr_is_gata(res)) {
if (cmd == HDIO_GET_IDENTITY)
return -ENOTTY;
- return ata_scsi_ioctl(sdev, cmd, arg);
+ return ata_sas_scsi_ioctl(res->sata_port->ap, sdev, cmd, arg);
}
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
index 7448387..1c558d3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@ int sas_ioctl(struct scsi_device *sdev, int cmd, void __user *arg)
struct domain_device *dev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
if (dev_is_sata(dev))
- return ata_scsi_ioctl(sdev, cmd, arg);
+ return ata_sas_scsi_ioctl(dev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, cmd, arg);
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index b6b8a7f..73b69c7 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -927,6 +927,8 @@ extern void ata_host_init(struct ata_host *, struct device *,
extern int ata_scsi_detect(struct scsi_host_template *sht);
extern int ata_scsi_ioctl(struct scsi_device *dev, int cmd, void __user *arg);
extern int ata_scsi_queuecmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, void (*done)(struct scsi_cmnd *));
+extern int ata_sas_scsi_ioctl(struct ata_port *ap, struct scsi_device *dev,
+ int cmd, void __user *arg);
extern void ata_sas_port_destroy(struct ata_port *);
extern struct ata_port *ata_sas_port_alloc(struct ata_host *,
struct ata_port_info *, struct Scsi_Host *);
--
1.6.4.2
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists