[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B183671.80004@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:06:41 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pata_it8213: MWDMA0 is unsupported
Hello.
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>>> MWDMA0 timings cannot be met with the PIIX based controller
>>>> programming interface.
>>
>>>> This change should be safe as this is how we have been doing
>>>> things in IDE it8213 host driver for years.
>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Verified with the documentation (similar case as with pata_efar).
>>
>>> Uhhh, no...
>>
>>> Too many damn drivers.
>>
>>> Too much damn duplication.
>>
>>> Too much damn subtle differences here and there.
>>
>>> The hardware is probably fine for MWMDA0 when it comes to
>>> pata_{efar,it8213},
>>> it just not documented properly in the data sheet.
>>
>> How so with pata_efar? The active/recovery bitfields are still 2-bit
>> wide, no?
>
> So.... pata_it8213 is fine for MWDMA0, then?
No, TTBOMK. I just have no datasheet. However, it's programmed
overclocked and even in theory the cycle time cannot exceeed 600 ns vs
480 ns spec'ed.
> Jeff
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists