| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200912032345.58339.bzolnier@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 23:45:58 +0100 From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com> To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes On Thursday 03 December 2009 11:30:50 pm Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 12/03/2009 05:23 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday 03 December 2009 11:10:51 pm Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Is it good kernel practice to intermingle cosmetic changes with > >> functional ones, in the same code lines? Also, no. > > > > I prefer using common sense over black-and-white rules. > > > > If patch is a _really_ tiny one (< 20 LOC changed) it sometimes makes > > sense to save the time on handling separate patches. > > This is open source -- you have to consider the time saved by reviewers too. Like I said previously this is best done on per-case basis and because it is open source eventually people will come up with an alternative patch if they find the current one too bothersome to review, merge etc. > But I doubt you have saved time on all your motivated commit searches, so... Well, just two basic searches limited to one contributor and one directory.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists