[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B18D66E.8020905@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:59:18 +0530
From: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
To: mingo@...e.hu, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] sched: fix GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS dependency
The newly introduced GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS does not seem to have any
effect without FAIR_SLEEPERS. Fix sysctl.sched_features to reflect
this. Without this change, a user who sets GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS
without FAIR_SLEEPERS would assume gentle sleeper fairness which
is not guaranteed.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -761,10 +761,22 @@ sched_feat_write(struct file *filp, cons
int len = strlen(sched_feat_names[i]);
if (strncmp(cmp, sched_feat_names[i], len) == 0) {
- if (neg)
+ if (neg) {
sysctl_sched_features &= ~(1UL << i);
- else
+ /*
+ * GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS have no effect without
+ * FAIR_SLEEPERS.
+ */
+ if (strncmp(cmp, "FAIR_SLEEPERS",
+ strlen("FAIR_SLEEPERS")) == 0)
+ sysctl_sched_features &= ~(1UL << i+1);
+ } else {
sysctl_sched_features |= (1UL << i);
+ if (strncmp(cmp, "GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS",
+ strlen("GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS"))
+ == 0)
+ sysctl_sched_features |= (1UL << i-1);
+ }
break;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists