linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: update normalized values on user updates via proc v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1259920152.3977.1820.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:49:12 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Holger.Wolf@...ibm.com, epasch@...ibm.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: update normalized values on user updates
 via proc v2

On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 12:16 +0100, ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> @@ -301,7 +303,9 @@ static struct ctl_table kern_table[] = {
>                 .data           = &sysctl_sched_shares_ratelimit,
>                 .maxlen         = sizeof(unsigned int),
>                 .mode           = 0644,
> -               .proc_handler   = &proc_dointvec,
> +               .proc_handler   = &sched_proc_update_handler,
> +               .extra1         = &min_sched_shares_ratelimit,
> +               .extra2         = &max_sched_shares_ratelimit,
>         }, 

While I don't object to that change it really should have been a
separate patch.

And at the very least the changelog should have said something about it.

Anyway, took all 3 patches.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/