[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091204111346.GL15126@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:13:46 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>
Cc: List Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <r.herring@...escale.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, valentin.longchamp@...l.ch,
daniel@...aq.de, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 06/10] fec: fix uninitialized rx buffer usage
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 04:47:06AM +0200, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <r.herring@...escale.com>
>
> The fec driver was enabling receive buffer descriptor without allocating
> the buffers. Make sure the buffer descriptors are initialized to not
> start receiving packets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r.herring@...escale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...onical.com>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/net/fec.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
> index 16a1d58..9a8743d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
> @@ -1658,6 +1658,7 @@ static int fec_enet_init(struct net_device *dev, int index)
> {
> struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> struct bufdesc *cbd_base;
> + struct bufdesc *bdp;
> int i;
>
> /* Allocate memory for buffer descriptors. */
> @@ -1710,6 +1711,34 @@ static int fec_enet_init(struct net_device *dev, int index)
> /* Set MII speed to 2.5 MHz */
> fep->phy_speed = ((((clk_get_rate(fep->clk) / 2 + 4999999)
> / 2500000) / 2) & 0x3F) << 1;
> +
> + /* Initialize the receive buffer descriptors. */
> + bdp = fep->rx_bd_base;
> + for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> +
> + /* Initialize the BD for every fragment in the page. */
> + bdp->cbd_sc = 0;
> + bdp++;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set the last buffer to wrap */
> + bdp--;
> + bdp->cbd_sc |= BD_SC_WRAP;
> +
> + /* ...and the same for transmit */
> + bdp = fep->tx_bd_base;
> + for (i = 0; i < TX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> +
> + /* Initialize the BD for every fragment in the page. */
> + bdp->cbd_sc = 0;
> + bdp->cbd_bufaddr = 0;
> + bdp++;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set the last buffer to wrap */
> + bdp--;
> + bdp->cbd_sc |= BD_SC_WRAP;
> +
> fec_restart(dev, 0);
I do not really understand why this patch is needed. You move the buffer
initialisation from fec_restart to fec_enet_init, but fec_restart is
called directly after the initialisation, so this shouldn't change much.
I don't need this patch on my boards, so I wonder what is really going
wrong here.
Sascha
>
> /* Queue up command to detect the PHY and initialize the
> @@ -1730,7 +1759,6 @@ static void
> fec_restart(struct net_device *dev, int duplex)
> {
> struct fec_enet_private *fep = netdev_priv(dev);
> - struct bufdesc *bdp;
> int i;
>
> /* Whack a reset. We should wait for this. */
> @@ -1768,33 +1796,6 @@ fec_restart(struct net_device *dev, int duplex)
> }
> }
>
> - /* Initialize the receive buffer descriptors. */
> - bdp = fep->rx_bd_base;
> - for (i = 0; i < RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> -
> - /* Initialize the BD for every fragment in the page. */
> - bdp->cbd_sc = BD_ENET_RX_EMPTY;
> - bdp++;
> - }
> -
> - /* Set the last buffer to wrap */
> - bdp--;
> - bdp->cbd_sc |= BD_SC_WRAP;
> -
> - /* ...and the same for transmit */
> - bdp = fep->tx_bd_base;
> - for (i = 0; i < TX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> -
> - /* Initialize the BD for every fragment in the page. */
> - bdp->cbd_sc = 0;
> - bdp->cbd_bufaddr = 0;
> - bdp++;
> - }
> -
> - /* Set the last buffer to wrap */
> - bdp--;
> - bdp->cbd_sc |= BD_SC_WRAP;
> -
> /* Enable MII mode */
> if (duplex) {
> /* MII enable / FD enable */
> --
> 1.6.3.3
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists