[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1259932366.5621.27.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:12:46 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: fix GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS dependency
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 17:12 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> On 12/04/2009 04:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 15:50 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:
> >>
> >> I think originally introduced as a development/debugging facility,
> >> sched_features is slowly transforming into a viable tool for System
> >> Administrators, by looking at the impact of turning on/off some of these
> >> features on some workloads (especially non-desktop workloads). And I
> >> think these benefits should be passed on to the end users perhaps in the
> >> form of documentation.
> >
> > This is really not meant to be used in that context. Its purely a debug
> > feature, with knobs coming and going as we see fit.
> >
>
> Does this also mean these features should not impact any specific
> workload much?
Not at all. Most loads will be heavily affected by one or more
features.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists