[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1259942997.17907.896.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:09:57 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 2/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair
task groups
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 20:04 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> +/*
> + * TODO: Check if this kind of timer setup is sufficient for cfs or
> + * should we do what rt is doing.
> + */
> +static void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg)
is there a reason not to do as rt does?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists