linux-kernel - Re: reiser4: newbie help needed?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B196455.6060308@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:34:45 +0100
From:	Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Buchner <buchner.johannes@....at>
CC:	reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: reiser4: newbie help needed?

Johannes Buchner wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:21:18 +0100
> Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@...il.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Johannes Buchner wrote:
>>     

Hello.

>>>  I took a look at the TODO lists, are there any simple tasks to
>>> do for newbies?
>>>       
>> If you mean the "todo for inclusion", then no.
>>
>> Reiser4 has only one technical issue. It can
>> be resolved only by very experienced people.
>>     
>
> Thanks for replying. I did not have to the inclusion of
> reiser4 in mind specifically.
>
>   
>>> I also believe that on 'sync', reiser4 currently does absolutely
>>> nothing.
>>>       
>> this is not good: a file system should respond on sync (1).
>>
>>     
>>>  The comment in reiser4_sync_inodes says reiser4 does its own
>>> flush elsewhere. Should this be different?
>>>   
>>>       
>> you might want to ask such question _before_ sending patches to akpm. 
>>     
>
> I was under the believe that I did not change the behaviour. I see my
> mistake now, I was looking at the wrong if-branch. 
>   

Nop. You've lost the whole point of using of ->sync_inodes(), which is
responsible for reiser4 background (and non-background) writeback,
and now it is not involved by any path.

Here is a good explanation why we need this additional super operation:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc3/2.6.21-rc3-mm1/broken-out/reiser4-sb_sync_inodes.patch

> I tried now to come up with a correct version for some hours, but I keep
> having NULL problems. Maybe a writeback_control object has to be
> created, possibly even in fs/fs-writeback.c:sync_inodes_sb, as
> write_inode_now does below. I tried that too, but it gave me a
> recursion.

It may happens because of missed checks that a process is of pdflush-style.
Perhaps, we need to rename the current_is_pdflush() and get it back.

Thanks,
Edward.

>  I'm not sure what the rationale was for introducing a call
> with NULL here. Sorry I can't correct this.
>
> Looking forward to your review.
>
> Best wishes,
> Johannes
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/