[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B19912B.8050009@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:46:03 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@...el.com>,
"Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"arjan@...ux.intel.com" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"chrisw@...s-sol.org" <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"jbeulich@...ell.com" <jbeulich@...ell.com>,
"peterm@...hat.com" <peterm@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_txt: add s3 userspace memory integrity verification
On 12/04/2009 02:39 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Having "security" technology that silently fails with funny bootloader
> is pretty bad, I'd say.
>
Yes, but this wouldn't be a silent failure -- such a boot loader
wouldn't be able to boot tboot itself either, nor would be able to boot
32-bit kernels (which, in fact, not all boot loaders can); the tboot
boot process in fact in many ways treats tboot itself as a 32-bit
primary kernel, with the Linux kernel as a secondary kernel.
So, this particular failure would not be silent by any means.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists