linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091204231527.GA3682@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Fri, 4 Dec 2009 15:15:28 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>
Cc:	awalls@...ix.net, j@...nau.net, jarod@...hat.com,
	jarod@...sonet.com, jonsmirl@...il.com, khc@...waw.pl,
	kraxel@...hat.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	mchehab@...hat.com, superm1@...ntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel
	IR  system?

On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:01:00AM +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
> 
> on 04 Dec 09 at 14:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 10:46:00PM +0100, Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
> >> Hi Mauro,
> >>
> >> on 04 Dec 09 at 12:33, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >>> Christoph Bartelmus wrote:
> >>>>>> Consider passing the decoded data through lirc_dev.
> >> [...]
> >>>> Consider cases like this:
> >>>> http://lirc.sourceforge.net/remotes/lg/6711A20015N
> >>>>
> >>>> This is an air-conditioner remote.
> >>>> The entries that you see in this config file are not really separate
> >>>> buttons. Instead the remote just sends the current settings for e.g.
> >>>> temperature encoded in the protocol when you press some up/down key. You
> >>>> really don't want to map all possible temperature settings to KEY_*
> >>>> events. For such cases it would be nice to have access at the raw scan
> >>>> codes from user space to do interpretation of the data.
> >>>> The default would still be to pass the data to the input layer, but it
> >>>> won't hurt to have the possibility to access the raw data somehow.
> >>
> >>> Interesting. IMHO, the better would be to add an evdev ioctl to return the
> >>> scancode for such cases, instead of returning the keycode.
> >>
> >> That means you would have to set up a pseudo keymap, so that you can get
> >> the key event which you could than react on with a ioctl. Or are you
> >> generating KEY_UNKNOWN for every scancode that is not mapped?
> >> What if different scan codes are mapped to the same key event? How do you
> >> retrieve the scan code for the key event?
> >> I don't think it can work this way.
> >>
> 
> > EV_MSC/MSC_SCAN.
> 
> How would I get the 64 bit scan codes that the iMON devices generate?
> How would I know that the scan code is 64 bit?
> input_event.value is __s32.
> 

I suppose we could add MSC_SCAN_END event so that we can transmit
"scancodes" of arbitrary length. You'd get several MSC_SCAN followed by
MSC_SCAN_END marker. If you don't get MSC_SCAN_END assume the code is 32
bit.

FWIW there is MSC_RAW as well.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/