[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0912051010450.15568@cobra.newdream.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 10:13:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
To: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@...eria.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/24] ceph: ref counted buffer
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Ingo Oeser wrote:
> On Friday 04 December 2009, Sage Weil wrote:
> > struct ceph_buffer is a simple ref-counted buffer. We transparently
> > choose between kmalloc for small buffers and vmalloc for large ones.
> >
> > This is currently used only for allocating memory for xattr data.
>
> Could you wrap parts of this refcounting logic around kref?
> see #include <linux/kref.h> and lib/kref.c
>
> It avoids a bug with memory areas for free and if anybody
> optimizes or changes refcounting stuff, you get all changes for free :-)
The only real difference it looks like are
smp_mb();
in get() and
smp_mb__after_atomic_inc();
in put. Is that needed for all other atomic_t refcounting too?
Switched to kref, and cleaned up the (partially unused) interface.
fs/ceph/buffer.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
fs/ceph/buffer.h | 30 ++++++------------------------
fs/ceph/inode.c | 11 +++++++----
fs/ceph/messenger.c | 2 +-
fs/ceph/xattr.c | 8 +++++---
5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists