[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9929d2390912041721g185d5f95s809a80811d2ac292@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 17:21:29 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/31] Constify struct e1000_mac_operations for 2.6.32 v1
2009/12/4 Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Emese,
>>
>> On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 01:03:03 +0100 Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote:
>>> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/82571.c
>>> @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static s32 e1000_init_mac_params_82571(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
>>> {
>>> struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>>> struct e1000_mac_info *mac = &hw->mac;
>>> + /* cannot be const */
>>> struct e1000_mac_operations *func = &mac->ops;
>>
>> Adding to the comment to say why it can't be const may allow us to fix
>> this later ...
>
> Ok, in the next patch series I will explain each case.
> --
Also, please sync up your patches with what is in Dave's net-next-2.6
tree, because some of the changes made no longer apply since the code
was either changed or removed.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists