[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1C0902.1050209@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 14:41:54 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] VM_LOCKED check don't need pte lock
On 12/04/2009 03:42 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> From 24f910b1ac966c21ea5aab825d1f26815b760304 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 16:06:47 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH 3/7] VM_LOCKED check don't need pte lock
>
> Currently, page_referenced_one() check VM_LOCKED after taking ptelock.
> But it's unnecessary. We can check VM_LOCKED before to take lock.
>
> This patch does it.
Nice optimization.
> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists