[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260070593.3236.6.camel@pc07.localdom.local>
Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:36:33 +0100
From: hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@...or.de>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
awalls@...ix.net, j@...nau.net, jarod@...hat.com,
jarod@...sonet.com, khc@...waw.pl, kraxel@...hat.com,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, mchehab@...hat.com, superm1@...ntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel
IR system?
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 04.12.2009, 19:28 -0500 schrieb Jon Smirl:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de> wrote:
> > BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit scan
> > codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol?
>
> Assuming a general purpose receiver (not one with fixed hardware
> decoding), is it important for Linux to receive IR signals from all
> possible remotes no matter how old or obscure? Or is it acceptable to
> tell the user to throw away their dedicated remote and buy a universal
> multi-function one? Universal multi-function remotes are $12 in my
> grocery store - I don't even have to go to an electronics store.
finally we have some point here, IMHO, that is not acceptable and I told
you previously not to bet on such. Start some poll and win it, and I'll
shut up :)
To be frank, you are quite mad at this point, or deliver working other
remotes to __all__ for free.
Cheers,
Hermann
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists