lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912051648520.3560@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:52:05 -0800 (PST)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33



On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > It all looks terminally broken: you force async suspend for all PCI 
> > drivers, even when it makes no sense.
> 
> I'm not exactly sure what you're referring to.  The async suspend is not
> forced, it just tells the PM core that it can execute PCI suspend/resume
> callbacks in parallel as long as the devices in question don't depend on each
> other.

That's exactly what I mean by forcing async suspend/resume.

You don't know the ordering rules for PCi devices. Multi-function PCI 
devices commonly share registers - they're on the same chip, after all. 
And even when the _hardware_ is totally independent, we often have 
discovery rules and want to initialize in order because different drivers 
will do things like unregister entirely on suspend, and then re-register 
on resume.

Imagine the mess when two ethernet devices randomly end up coming up with 
different names (eth0/eth1) depending on subtle timing issues.

THAT is why we do things in order. Asynchronous programming is _hard_. 
Just deciding that "all PCI devices can always be resumed and suspended 
asynchronously" is a much MUCH bigger decision than you seem to have 
even realized.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ