[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091207012140.GB4966@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 02:21:41 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 13/23] plist: Make plist debugging raw_spinlock aware
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 06:02:57PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> plists are used with spinlocks and raw_spinlocks. Change the plist
> debugging to handle both types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
> include/linux/plist.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> kernel/futex.c | 6 +++---
> lib/plist.c | 8 +++++---
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/plist.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/include/linux/plist.h
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/plist.h
> @@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ struct plist_head {
> struct list_head prio_list;
> struct list_head node_list;
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST
> - spinlock_t *lock;
> + raw_spinlock_t *rawlock;
> + spinlock_t *spinlock;
> #endif
> };
This could be a union probably, as we don't use both at the
same time?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists