[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091207040255.GA5262@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:02:57 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc?
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:34:43PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> VERY very sorry for my long silence...
>
> Please don't commit this patch, Ingo.
> This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock.
>
> I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi.
> Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc?
>
> At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 ,
> support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.
I guess this patch handled the nature of the strings, but the current
end use is in perl. There is no support of it in raw_field_ptr().
Your patch looks good to me..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists