linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:02:57 +0100
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc?

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:34:43PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> VERY very sorry for my long silence...
> 
> Please don't commit this patch, Ingo.
> This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock.
> 
> I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi.
> Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc?
> 
> At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 ,
> support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.



I guess this patch handled the nature of the strings, but the current
end use is in perl. There is no support of it in raw_field_ptr().

Your patch looks good to me..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/