linux-kernel - linux-next: slab tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091207151136.46c85ee4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:11:36 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: slab tree build failure

Hi all,

Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:

tests/slab_test.c: In function 'test_func':
tests/slab_test.c:176: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed'

Caused by commit 1c999557258d251e2e5790de4b723d5996c06d5d ("Add slab
performance tests").

set_cpus_allowed it now only defined if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is not
set.  This was changed by commit e0ad955680878998ff7dc51ce06ddad12260423a
("cpumask: don't define set_cpus_allowed() if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y")
which entered Linus' tree before 2.6.32-rc1.

I have used the version of the slab tree from next-20091204 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped