linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: reduce write depth only if sync was delayed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091207144149.GZ8742@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 15:41:50 +0100
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc:	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: reduce write depth only if sync was
	delayed

On Mon, Dec 07 2009, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sun, Dec 06 2009, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> >> Hi Jeff,
> >> I remember you saw large performance drop on your SAN for sequential
> >> writes with low_latency=1.  Can you test if Shaohua's and this patch
> >> fix allow to recover some bandwidth?  I think that enabling the queue
> >> depth ramp up only if a sync request was delayed should disable it for
> >> fast hardware like yours, so you should not be seeing the slowdown any
> >> more.
> >
> > I queued this up for post inclusion into 2.6.33, with the time_after()
> > fixed.
> >
> > The patch was word-wrapped, btw.
> 
> So in what branch can I find this fix?  Once I know that I can queue up
> some tests.

It's in next-2.6.33

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/