[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091207202146.GE5049@nowhere>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 21:21:49 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing - fix function graph trace to properly display
failed entries
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:46:16AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > sure, but it is not the trace_seq structure that overflows, it is the bare
> > seq_file underneath. The s_show calls "trace_print_seq":
> >
> > void trace_print_seq(struct seq_file *m, struct trace_seq *s)
> > {
> > int len = s->len >= PAGE_SIZE ? PAGE_SIZE - 1 : s->len;
> >
> > seq_write(m, s->buffer, len);
> >
> > trace_seq_init(s);
> > }
> >
> > it flushes the trace_seq to the seq_file and reinits the trace_seq.
> > But the seq_file will get filled in the end, ending up with
> > not displayed output in that case I described in the first email.
> >
>
> hi, any feedback on this?
>
> thanks,
> jirka
Steven has done some tests and it looks like you were right, the
problem comes from the seq_file, not the trace_seq.
Steve, any news about it?
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists