[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091207220501.GF32454@fieldses.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:05:01 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Add warning about leading
contination tests
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 09:58:04AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index bc4114f..c35933a 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2064,6 +2064,11 @@ sub process {
> CHK("multiple assignments should be avoided\n" . $herecurr);
> }
>
> +# Check use of leading logical continuation tests
> + if ($line =~ /^.\s*(\|\||&&)/) {
> + WARN("Continuation logic should be at end of previous line\n" . $herecurr);
> + }
> +
> ## # check for multiple declarations, allowing for a function declaration
> ## # continuation.
> ## if ($line =~ /^.\s*$Type\s+$Ident(?:\s*=[^,{]*)?\s*,\s*$Ident.*/ &&
Where does this preference come from?
In
excessivelylongcondition
&& anotherreallylongcondition
&& yetanotherunbelievablylongcondition
&& yetanotherwellyougettheidea
I want to be able to keep the &&'s all justified.
Or look for well-typeset math or CS texts and try to find any that leave
operators dangling on the right.
I don't really care much about this particular point, but: the
checkpatch output is already getting too verbose to be useful, without
adding advice that's actually the opposite of what I'd normally want to
do....
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists