[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B1E086E.7040001@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:03:58 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] tracing: Extract calls to trace_define_common_fields()
>>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
>>> @@ -1113,10 +1113,6 @@ static int kprobe_event_define_fields(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call)
>>> struct kprobe_trace_entry field;
>>> struct trace_probe *tp = (struct trace_probe *)event_call->data;
>>>
>>> - ret = trace_define_common_fields(event_call);
>>> - if (!ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> -
>>> DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, ip, FIELD_STRING_IP, 0);
>>> DEFINE_FIELD(int, nargs, FIELD_STRING_NARGS, 1);
>>> /* Set argument names as fields */
>>> @@ -1131,10 +1127,6 @@ static int kretprobe_event_define_fields(struct ftrace_event_call *event_call)
>>> struct kretprobe_trace_entry field;
>>> struct trace_probe *tp = (struct trace_probe *)event_call->data;
>>>
>>> - ret = trace_define_common_fields(event_call);
>>> - if (!ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> -
>>> DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, func, FIELD_STRING_FUNC, 0);
>>> DEFINE_FIELD(unsigned long, ret_ip, FIELD_STRING_RETIP, 0);
>>> DEFINE_FIELD(int, nargs, FIELD_STRING_NARGS, 1);
>> "if (!ret)" is wrong. trace_define_common_fields() returns zero when success.
>> So "unsigned long, func", "unsigned long, ret_ip" ...etc are NOT "defined"
>> and filters can not be applied for trace_kprobe.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>
> Oh right!
>
> Ok, I'm queueing this one for the tracing fixes.
> Thanks!
>
This patch has dependency on the previous patch..So can you queue
all other patches and send a pull request to Ingo? We're still
in the early merge window, so those patches should be fine for
.33.
And as this patch fixes a bug "acidentally", the changelog
needs a bit revision.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists