[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0912080916300.4948@axis700.grange>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:20:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <iwamatsu.nobuhiro@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] sh: stylistic improvements for the DMA driver
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> <g.liakhovetski@....de> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
> > ---
> > drivers/dma/shdma.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > drivers/dma/shdma.h | 14 +++++++-------
> > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> [..]
> > -static int dmae_is_idle(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan)
> > +static int dmae_is_busy(struct sh_dmae_chan *sh_chan)
>
> This one isn't purely style, I agree with it, but think it would be a
> bit cleaner to return a bool rather than an error code.
Yes, I also thought about it, but I wasn't sure whether the author had
some special considerations, why he has chosen to return an error code.
Besides, that return code is also used in functions dmae_set_chcr() and
dmae_set_dmars() as their return value. So, you'd have to change those two
to something like
if (dmae_is_busy(sh_chan))
return -EBUSY;
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists