[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091208094825.GA5035@nowhere>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:48:27 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] ftrace: Call trace_parser_clear() properly
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 11:15:30AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> I found a weird behavior:
>
> # echo 'fuse:*' > set_ftrace_filter
> bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
> # cat set_ftrace_filter
> fuse_dev_fasync
> fuse_dev_poll
> fuse_copy_do
>
> We should call trace_parser_clear() no matter ftrace_process_regex()
> returns 0 or -errno.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> index 08a3fb5..ff8aecd 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> @@ -2208,10 +2208,9 @@ ftrace_regex_write(struct file *file, const char __user *ubuf,
> !trace_parser_cont(parser)) {
> ret = ftrace_process_regex(parser->buffer,
> parser->idx, enable);
> + trace_parser_clear(parser);
> if (ret)
> goto out_unlock;
> -
> - trace_parser_clear(parser);
> }
I'm missing something. How that can happen. Anytime we reopen
the file, the parser is re-allocated.
I guess that happens if you open in rw mode? But not using the
example in the changelog?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists