[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m17hsx1zbw.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:26:27 -0800
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] bkl core patches for 2.6.33
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
>>
>> > Linus,
>> >
>> > Please pull the latest bkl-core-for-linus git tree from:
>> >
>> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git bkl-core-for-linus
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Was this tree in linux-next? I'm certain I would have remembered the
>> conflict in kernel/sysctl.c. Among other things in my sysctl tree
>> lock_kernel() is gone. The removal of lock_kernel() happened to fall
>> out of my other changes. I remember having a conversation with Arnd
>> Bergmann about this, and the conclusion being was that my change
>> correct and superior to this patch. So I'm surprised a sysctl change
>> made it into your tree.
>
> Sorry, that change was excluded from next and I completely forgot
> about your patches when I was preparing the pull request. Zapped the
> commit in question already.
Thanks. That is one less minor conflict to worry about.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists