linux-kernel - Re: [patch 09/23] locking: Implement new raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2674af740912080533o12878af5ve2fb88e5e1c0a286@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:33:13 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 09/23] locking: Implement new raw_spinlock

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Now that the raw_spin name space is freed up, we can implement
> raw_spinlock and the related functions which are used to annotate the
> locks which are not converted to sleeping spinlocks in preempt-rt.
>
> A side effect is that only such locks can be used with the low level
> lock fsunctions which circumvent lockdep.

s/fsunctions/functions
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/