[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091208144235.GA28615@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 09:42:35 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq: Optimization for close cooperating queue searching
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 03:43:41PM +0800, Gui Jianfeng wrote:
> It doesn't make any sense to try to find out a close cooperating
> queue if current cfqq is the only one in the group.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>
Thanks Gui. Looks good.
Vivek
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index cfb0b2f..89b5dd9 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -1750,6 +1750,12 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_close_cooperator(struct cfq_data *cfqd,
> return NULL;
>
> /*
> + * Don't search priority tree if it's the only queue in the group.
> + */
> + if (cur_cfqq->cfqg->nr_cfqq == 1)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /*
> * We should notice if some of the queues are cooperating, eg
> * working closely on the same area of the disk. In that case,
> * we can group them together and don't waste time idling.
> --
> 1.5.4.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists