[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m33a3ltrjz.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:26:56 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@...or.de>,
Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>, awalls@...ix.net,
j@...nau.net, jarod@...hat.com, jarod@...sonet.com,
kraxel@...hat.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
superm1@...ntu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com> writes:
> The enable/disable protocol decoder enable/disable interface is needed anyway,
> due to the needs for the hardware IR decoders
Why do they need it exactly?
The key tables say all they need I hope?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists